The infringement case of “STOLICHNAYA” Trademark (Russian Vodka) , representing by the authority of SPIRITS INT’L N.V, Switzerland.
In the year 2007, we have given strong cease and desist letters to the infringing sale centers in Yangon where the bottles of liquor bearing Counterfeit mark STOLICHNAYA were being distributed. As the result, all the sales centers entirely stopped selling the imitated products and thus, the case is solved to the advantage of our client and it did not reach to litigation.
The infringement case of “ ” Trademark representing by the authority of Big C Supercenter Public Co., Ltd., Thailand.
In the year 2007, we have also sent the cease and desist letter to the proprietor of a local super market which used the identical of above trademark as its name. After sending cease and desist letter, the said proprietor came to discuss with us and as a result the said super market came to a close , the registration of opposite party’s mark was withdrawn and amicable solution was reached.
The infringement case of GE Trademark representing by the authority of GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, USA
Also in the year 2007, we have sent the cease and desist letter to the infringer who was using identical of GE Trademark . we received first response from the attorney of opposite party and let him view the evidential documents revealing our client’s strong status. Then , according to the attorney of the opposite party, the infringement action has ceased by the infringer since the time of receiving our cease and desist letter, thus the litigation was not necessary.
The litigation regarding the Ownership Right of Trademark “ ” representing by the authority of MJM Holding Co., Ltd., Singapore
In the year 2008, that was our turn to receive cease and desist letter from the opposite party regarding the ownership right of the trademark “ ” registered by our Client to be used in respect of milk and milk products. After reviewing all the circumstances, the case was brought to the Court by us with civil law suit against the opposite party, which ended to the favour of our client.
© 2025 HT IP Law Firm. All Rights Reserved. Web Design by NetScriper